Comparison
ExperimentHQ vs PostHog When You Want Experiments, Not Dashboards
TL;DR — Verdict
Choose ExperimentHQ if you want visual, no-code A/B testing for marketers. Choose PostHog if you're a developer-first team that needs product analytics with experimentation as a side feature.
ExperimentHQ
Built for marketers & growth teams
- Visual editor (no code)
- 2-minute setup
- No-flicker by default
PostHog
Built for developers
- Product analytics
- Feature flags
- Session recordings
The Key Difference
PostHog is a product analytics platform with experimentation as one of many features. ExperimentHQ is a dedicated A/B testing tool built specifically for that purpose.
PostHog requires code changes to run experiments. ExperimentHQ has a visual editor that lets marketers create tests without developers.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ExperimentHQ | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Editor | ||
| No-Code A/B Tests | ||
| Free Plan | ||
| Product Analytics | ||
| Session Recordings | ||
| Feature Flags | ||
| Setup Time | 2 minutes | 30+ minutes |
| Target Audience | Marketers | Developers |
| No-Flicker Testing |
The Bottom Line
"PostHog users are dev-first but UX-weak when it comes to experimentation. When you want experiments, not dashboards, ExperimentHQ is the better choice. Visual editor, no-flicker, and purpose-built for A/B testing."